Pussy Wiggle Stomp -->
Tuesday, November 18, 2014
Chuck Mangione - Feels So Good and Don Ellis - Pussy Wiggle Stomp (I COULDN'T DECIDED!!!!!)
Feels So Good --> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMGyk5bXNAc&list=PLhRTOVD95hC3bw1jmk0kcTZWhISWXuXD4
Monday, November 17, 2014
Concert Report: Ithaca College Symphony Orchestra
For my third concert report, I decided to attend a concert featuring the Ithaca College Symphony Orchestra on Sunday, November 16th at 4:00 PM. The orchestra was conducted by Jeffery Meyer. The orchestra performed two compositions. The first was Gunther Schuller's Concerto No. 2 for Tuba and Orchestra which highlighted Dr. Aaron Tindall, the assistant professor of tuba and euphonium at Ithaca College, School of Music, on the tuba. The orchestra concluded the program with Johannes Brahms' Symphony No. 3 in F major, Op. 90.
The first piece by Schuller begins with a dark harmony in five solo string basses and is then answered by the solo tuba. The piece encompassed many modernistic ideals and twentieth century music throughout each movement. Not only does the composition highlight the tuba, but it focuses more on each and every lower-pitch instrument as well. This reverberates back to how sound color was expanded during the time period, giving music its unique tonal quality as well as its unconventionality. I also took note of how sporadic some the melodic phrases from each section of the orchestra were. Each one would enter at completely random moments in a movement thus creating chaos that resembled society during the twentieth century. Overall, listening to this piece I felt as if I was in an old horror film. While the lower-pitched instruments had the melody, the higher-pitched instruments, specifically the violin section, played high, screeching notes that juxtaposed the lower-pitch instruments and formed an atmosphere that was spooky, frightening and quite unsettling. The piece concluded with an emphatic mercado note creating a loud BANG along with a loud CRACK in the background that sounded like the crack of a whip. I don't know if that was intentional or not, but for me personally it definitely punctuated an already ominous, eery composition perfectly.
I found my spirit being revitalized during the final piece by Brahms since it was much more lively than the previous composition. I also heard a more romantic style in the music as the melodies were longer and flowed more. Unlike Schuller's concert, Brahms' symphony featured the highter-pitched instruments, in particular the clarinet, which I felt connected to the overall theme of freedom in the music. The higher the instruments played, the more I felt as if I was flying higher to greater altitudes in the sky. The first movement establishes the grandiose theme of the piece with its wistful melodies. The second movement is more warm and lyrical as it yearns to return to the melodies from the first movement. Both the second and third movements establish a single pure atmosphere that eventually blooms into its full character. The second piece is more pleasant as the clarinet section is most prominent. Whereas the third movement brings out the cello section more and is more intimate, personal and passionate. All of this comes together and leads into a fourth and final movement that is dramatic and forceful. For me, the fourth movement transforms the composition into a tranquil world that its listeners are hypnotized by.
To conclude, the performance by the Ithaca College Symphony Orchestra was mind-blowing. I honestly thought I was listening to a professional orchestra. I currently play in the campus band here at Ithaca, and I think we sound pretty good for a bunch of non-music majors. But when hearing this performance, there's no contest. No doubt I would absolutely attend another program by the Ithaca College Symphony Orchestra.
Sunday, November 16, 2014
HW 15: Stravinsky's Rite of Spring and 20th Century Modernism Short Essay
The twentieth century was a period of highs and lows. Technology flourished as radio, telephones, television, satellites and computers were assimilated into our everyday lives. We now had a vast repertoire of tools for communication. Medical science prevailed greatly by defeating numerous infectious diseases while developing complex surgical procedures for expanding one's lifespan. On the other hand, we endured much turmoil through the economic downfall of the Great Depression. We had to suffer through a two world wars as well as wars in Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq. To put into simpler terms, the twentieth century was an era of drastic contrasts. As for the music of the time period, twentieth-century music quite avant-garde and diverse due to the much experimentation by musicians. The tonal system was revamped entirely. The length of compositions varied from very short to very long. Sound color advanced with new instrumentation. Iconic Russian composer Igor Stravinsky's music best embodies the characteristics of twentieth century music and society itself. The Rite of Spring, one of Stravinsky's most famous compositions, portrays twentieth century aesthetics of modernism such as juxtaposition and stratification through the piece's dynamics and its melodies.
Part I of Stravinsky's The Rite of Spring is littered with juxtaposing elements. From 3:30-5:10 is where there is a great deal of contrast between melodic phrases. Frequently throughout this section of the piece, we hear a soft, gentle melody at first. That melody is then contradicted by the ensuing bombastic string of eighth notes. Stravinsky does this for the purpose of scrambling his listener's moods and building up tension. The contrast of two opposing sides in the music also relates to the juxtaposition of society during the twentieth century. Particularly in the United States, despite technological advancements and booming economies, our country was still off fighting overseas at the same time. While at home we were thriving in our blossoming nation, our brethren were away from home and were being slaughtered by the thousands on the battlefield. There was also a similar contrast within the field of medicine. While there was significant growth in medical science in the twentieth century, science was not able to combat with the AIDS epidemic during the 1980s. On a broader note, the title of the composition juxtaposes the music itself. When we think of the title, The Rite of Spring, just by itself, we imagine something more warm, joyful, peaceful and celebratory since the title literally means the ceremony of the season of spring. Instead we get very dark and serious music that brings unsettlement to our ears.
Another common theme highlighted in Part I of The Rite of Spring is the theme of stratification. From 2:00-3:05 we hear layers upon layers of different phrases from various instrument sections. Not only does each layer of sound produce an ambiguous atmosphere, but more importantly it creates utter chaos. The twentieth century with out a doubt had its moments of insanity. With world wars, the war on drugs, the Great Depression and deadly diseases sweeping the nation, there was never a dull moment. Life was so sporadic and unpredictable; you never knew what would come next. Similar to the melodies played in this section. All of the motions of the melodies prove to be very erratic and as they jump in at completely different times, mixing and jumbling together, and forming a clutter of confusion that leads its listeners to wondering when will all of this be made more clear.
On the whole, Igor Stravinsky's timeless composition The Rite of Spring accurately represents the ideals of twentieth century modernism with its juxtaposing dynamics and its spontaneous melodies. Aside from these aspects, Stravinsky's piece also evokes new sounds from instruments, specifically from the bassoon in the exposition. The bassoon is usually played in the lower register, however in this tune, the bassoonist plays the melody at such a high register for the bassoon that it almost sounds like an oboe. This feature of the composition resembles how the new technology of the twentieth century affected society. Whereas this new sound on the bassoon augmented the music's sound color, the new inventions of technology during this time gave an uniqueness to everyday life for humanity.
(My Outline)
Monday, October 27, 2014
Octubafest 2014
For my second concert report, I attended Octubafest 2014 on Monday October 27 at 7:00 PM in Ford Hall. The show was highlighted the Tuba/Euphonium Studio which played an array of music ranging from classical to latin to pop while also dressing up in some pretty goofy and outrageous Halloween costumes!
One of my favorite pieces from the entire recital had to be Introduction to Dance. The tune featured a solo euphonium player accompanied by a pianist. I found the composition to be quite eery and intense. I felt this way through out the piece mostly because of the dissonant chord's that were played on the piano. The piano struck these auspicious chords almost as an emphasis during the euphonium's solo. Towards the end of the arrangement, I was able to identify two consecutive sentences. The basic ideas and continuations of these sentences, in particular the final sentence of the chart, were built around ascending triads. These triads would crescendo and accelerate to build a high level of tension until the euphonium player blared out the final emphatic note of the piece. For me this piece revoked the ideals of Romanticism, more specifically the theme of the rise of the individual since Introduction to Dance highlighted the solo euphonium player.
The following composition, Euphonium Concerto II. Lento, had contrasting moods towards the previous piece. Like Introduction to Dance, this tune featured a solo euphonium player accompanied by a pianist. This time, however, the piano's harmonies were more light and elegant. The piano in this piece played a bit more softer at a dynamic of piano, whereas the piano in Introduction to Dance played at a dynamic of forte. I also took note during certain parts of the piece that the piano alternated pleasant and dissonant chords which jumbled up my mood. At times I wasn't sure how I should react towards the tune. As for the solo euphonium player, I found the melody to have singing-quality with the light vibrato used. I imagined a melancholy love though out the arrangement, specifically someone singing his/her lover to return to his/her grasp.
After Euphonium Concerto II. Lento came Selections from Halloween Suite. For this set, the musicians played This Is Halloween and Thriller. The fact that Thriller was played by tubas a euphoniums was a kind of unusual and strange. I'm used to the actual recording of the song and marching and jazz band arrangements where song is more loud, vibrant, and zesty. With just tubas and euphoniums playing it, the tune is not as blaring and has more of a mellow, rich sound.
On the whole, I enjoyed Octubafest 2014. I've never really heard the sound of euphonium and I have to admit that it makes a beautiful sound. One last thing I noticed was how the more dramatic pieces ended in a loud staccato or mercado note while the more gentle pieces ended in a soft whole note. I feel as if these types of endings suite the established moods of those pieces.
One of my favorite pieces from the entire recital had to be Introduction to Dance. The tune featured a solo euphonium player accompanied by a pianist. I found the composition to be quite eery and intense. I felt this way through out the piece mostly because of the dissonant chord's that were played on the piano. The piano struck these auspicious chords almost as an emphasis during the euphonium's solo. Towards the end of the arrangement, I was able to identify two consecutive sentences. The basic ideas and continuations of these sentences, in particular the final sentence of the chart, were built around ascending triads. These triads would crescendo and accelerate to build a high level of tension until the euphonium player blared out the final emphatic note of the piece. For me this piece revoked the ideals of Romanticism, more specifically the theme of the rise of the individual since Introduction to Dance highlighted the solo euphonium player.
The following composition, Euphonium Concerto II. Lento, had contrasting moods towards the previous piece. Like Introduction to Dance, this tune featured a solo euphonium player accompanied by a pianist. This time, however, the piano's harmonies were more light and elegant. The piano in this piece played a bit more softer at a dynamic of piano, whereas the piano in Introduction to Dance played at a dynamic of forte. I also took note during certain parts of the piece that the piano alternated pleasant and dissonant chords which jumbled up my mood. At times I wasn't sure how I should react towards the tune. As for the solo euphonium player, I found the melody to have singing-quality with the light vibrato used. I imagined a melancholy love though out the arrangement, specifically someone singing his/her lover to return to his/her grasp.
After Euphonium Concerto II. Lento came Selections from Halloween Suite. For this set, the musicians played This Is Halloween and Thriller. The fact that Thriller was played by tubas a euphoniums was a kind of unusual and strange. I'm used to the actual recording of the song and marching and jazz band arrangements where song is more loud, vibrant, and zesty. With just tubas and euphoniums playing it, the tune is not as blaring and has more of a mellow, rich sound.
On the whole, I enjoyed Octubafest 2014. I've never really heard the sound of euphonium and I have to admit that it makes a beautiful sound. One last thing I noticed was how the more dramatic pieces ended in a loud staccato or mercado note while the more gentle pieces ended in a soft whole note. I feel as if these types of endings suite the established moods of those pieces.
Friday, October 24, 2014
Caspar David Friedrich --- Wanderer Above the Sea Mist
Right off the bat when I took my first glance at Wanderer Above the Sea Mist, I noticed the painting conveyed the individualism. Clearly, the main focus of the painting is this single man atop this mountain, gazing across the landscape. One predominant characteristic of Romanticism was the rise of the individual/dreamer. In Friedrich's painting, we see a single man that has risen to the highest peak of a mountain or hill above the clouds. For me, I got the sense that the man is looking out onto this vast and endless mountainous scene right in front of him and is dreaming, according to the romantic individual, of ceaseless opportunities and potential that come his way. Also, I thought this connects to the music of the nineteenth century. A lot of romantic music focused on the solos in music, specifically piano solos. In addition, one of the key themes of romantic music is individual feeling. Through the use of solos, a single performer is able to express his/her own unique thoughts and emotions on an idea presented in a musical composition.
Another Romantic ideal I found prominent was the glorification of nature. During this time period, nature was portrayed through awesome, powerful, and even horrifying elements. This painting in particular, most of the aspects that I examined I found to be somewhat ominous and eery. Personally, I found the presence of the clouds/haze cover the majority of the landscape to be unclear, unsettling and auspicious. The clouds/haze masking the environment in front of the individual gave me the sense that what the dreamer is searching deeply for answers through the white veil blanketing the setting and the man's thoughts.
One last Romantic ideal I explored was the pursuit of spiritual self-awareness. Reverting back to what I said before in regards to the man trying to search for answers, I believe that those answers that he is searching for are about himself. He is yearning for the unknown and the unknowable. My guess at what the man might be thinking about his maybe his health. I'm not entirely sure if what he has is a cane or a walking stick, but assuming it's a cane, I felt as if he is pondering about his future and how his health will affect it and is dreaming of good fortune later in his life.
Friday, October 10, 2014
Joseph Haydn - Symphony No. 45 in F-sharp minor "Farewell" (Mackerras)
I decided to analyze the a phrase of Joseph Haydn's Symphony No. 45 in F-sharp minor "Farewell" (Mackerras). The piece is written in a 3/4 time signature. This gives the song waltz-like quality to it. However, I didn't get that light-hearted feeling that you usually sense when listening to a waltz or any song with dancing quality. I found the tune to be quite heavy, dramatic and serious. I sensed a lot of anger, frustration, and tension throughout the song. The fact that the piece is written in such an obscure key, F-sharp minor, contributes to the eerie atmosphere surrounding the music. The dynamic changes also emphasize the emotion and drama. I pictured two distraught lovers bickering with one and another to the point in which utter chaos breaks out and one of them barges out of the doors, leaving the other lover with the feeling of guilt and wanting to mend the relationship they once had.
I chose the beginning phrase of the song (0:00-0:15) for my analysis. Immediately I recognized the sentence phrase from the first two measures. The basic idea is established in the first two measures with the descending quarter note arpeggios. The idea is repeated in the preceding two measures, except its played a half-step above (this builds the tension within the phrase). Then comes the continuation which is four measures long. Here, the first two measures of the song are presented once again and all the sudden, a rapid fire of sixteenth notes explode out of the violins, creating utter madness. The continuation ends on the tonic chord, thus ending on a perfect authentic cadence.
Sentence Phrase Diagram:
Sentence Phrase Diagram:
The phrase I chose and dissected represents the ideals of the Enlightenment period. It symbolizes the conversations between solonnieres that occur in the salons. One person would present an idea/topic for discussion (basic idea). Another person would then share his/her perspective on the idea/topic (basic idea repeated). Then there would be much heated discussion and argument between the solonnieres (continuation) until they finally reached an overall consensus on the subject matter (ending on a PAC).
Monday, September 29, 2014
Enlightenment Era Ideals
The Enlightenment period was embodied by the notion that social authority comes from the people being governed. This period, known as "The Age of Reason", elevated science and rational over religion and supernatural power. It was a time where great thinkers such as John Locke and Thomas Hobbes questioned "human nature" and why society behaves in certain manners. These questions would eventually give birth the ideals of this time period.
After watching Don Giovanni, I was able to pick up a couple of Enlightenment aspects within the opera. The fact that Don Giovanni is painted as the villain represents how aristocrats during the Enlightenment were portrayed as dark spirited.
After watching Don Giovanni, I was able to pick up a couple of Enlightenment aspects within the opera. The fact that Don Giovanni is painted as the villain represents how aristocrats during the Enlightenment were portrayed as dark spirited.
Specifically, the opera connects to two statements by two Enlightenment thinkers:
- People are naturally free. No one need ask permission of anyone else before acting. - John Locke
- Humans want two things: to increase pleasure and to avoid pain. - Thomas Hobbes
During Don Giovanni and Zerlina's duet, they both sang the line, "We'll go, my dearest, and ease the pains of innocent love." At this point, Don Giovanni has successfully won over Zerlina's heart. Their plan to "ease the pains of innocent love" resembles the comments of Thomas Hobbes. In order to avoid these "pains of innocent love", Don Giovanni and Zerlina seek marriage and a life of lust as a way to raise pleasure while masking any suffering.
My initial reaction when I first read up on the Enlightenment period, I thought to myself how free and nonchalant society was then. People began to stray away from some of life's norms and strived to live differently beyond what was socially acceptable before then.
Monday, September 22, 2014
Bruno Nettl - Folk Music
For me, folk music is defined as a specific genre of music that pertains to a specific group of people or "folk" (regional, race, religion, etc.). The music mainly tells a story regarding the history of that said group of individuals.
In Bruno Nettl's essay, An Introduction to Folk Music in the United States, Nettl doesn't give an exact textbook definition to folk music, but states that the origin and how the music is constructed and presented determines whether or not it is truly folk music. At the same time, Nettl proposes various binary oppositions to help distinguish folk music from other types of music. Nettl brings up some valid points that I certainly agree with (how folk music is structured compared to other music and such), and some that I may have second opinions on. However, my biggest issue with Nettl is his harsh tone towards folk music, that he preaches to his readers that folk music is meant for those of lower social class and is "primitive".
When comparing folk music to cultivative music there are some significant differences that characterize the two. Cultivative music appears to be more complicated, especially with its melodies and harmonies. Cultivative compositions use an assortment of pitches and rhythms. The melodies are constructed on many levels of texture. Folk music, on the other hand, tends to have more simple melodies and is monophonic and follow a strophic form frequently. I don't agree with the notion that folk music isn't played by professionals or well-known musicians. The iconic Bob Dylan and his music for instance can be classified as folk music by some people. The song "Tangled Up in Blue" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YwSZvHqf9qM) best represents Nettl's description of folk music. It follows a simple melody throughout, but still tells of a story with heart and passion that captivates its listeners.
This comparison by Nettl is a prime to the point I mentioned before of him downgrading folk music's purpose and segregating it from cultivative music's elegance. He portrays cultivative music as the superior genre by calling it "sophisticated" and "composer-known" and saying it is meant for only the upperclass. Meanwhile, Nettl stamps folk music with label of "primitive" and being recognized as lower-class music. Unlike folk music, cultivative music is written down, thus emphasizing its prominence among its music brethren.
My problem with Nettl is that he fails to realize that folk music, though different to cultivative music in many fashions, has an equivalent importance to its listeners. Primitive music, in comparison to cultivative music, uses different and few pitches, scales, and tonal patterns. Its tones are "unessential". Its melodic phrase are concise and concentrated. In essence, folk music doesn't have the "beef" to tussle with cultivative music which uses deep, broad, flowing phrases alongside with more challenging time signatures (folk music typically use the standard ones: 4/4, 3/4, 6/8). I don't see what's all the hubbub around this debate. There is no dominant music style or genre because each one pertains to its own unique audience. In my opinion, folk music is substantial. Each type of music touches someone differently, good or bad. Folk music hits home for some because it's more narrative than others. Listeners are able to connect with folk music either on a religious level, cultural level, etc. In fact, I feel as if folk music is a step above cultivative music in the sense of how open and independent it is, where cultivative music can be straight forward. Folk music's oral tradition enables it's freedom in the music community and allows it to evolve over time. Also, who cares if a song wasn't written or composed by someone famous. Personally, music is solely about the enjoyment of it, not its popularity.
In Bruno Nettl's essay, An Introduction to Folk Music in the United States, Nettl doesn't give an exact textbook definition to folk music, but states that the origin and how the music is constructed and presented determines whether or not it is truly folk music. At the same time, Nettl proposes various binary oppositions to help distinguish folk music from other types of music. Nettl brings up some valid points that I certainly agree with (how folk music is structured compared to other music and such), and some that I may have second opinions on. However, my biggest issue with Nettl is his harsh tone towards folk music, that he preaches to his readers that folk music is meant for those of lower social class and is "primitive".
When comparing folk music to cultivative music there are some significant differences that characterize the two. Cultivative music appears to be more complicated, especially with its melodies and harmonies. Cultivative compositions use an assortment of pitches and rhythms. The melodies are constructed on many levels of texture. Folk music, on the other hand, tends to have more simple melodies and is monophonic and follow a strophic form frequently. I don't agree with the notion that folk music isn't played by professionals or well-known musicians. The iconic Bob Dylan and his music for instance can be classified as folk music by some people. The song "Tangled Up in Blue" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YwSZvHqf9qM) best represents Nettl's description of folk music. It follows a simple melody throughout, but still tells of a story with heart and passion that captivates its listeners.
This comparison by Nettl is a prime to the point I mentioned before of him downgrading folk music's purpose and segregating it from cultivative music's elegance. He portrays cultivative music as the superior genre by calling it "sophisticated" and "composer-known" and saying it is meant for only the upperclass. Meanwhile, Nettl stamps folk music with label of "primitive" and being recognized as lower-class music. Unlike folk music, cultivative music is written down, thus emphasizing its prominence among its music brethren.
My problem with Nettl is that he fails to realize that folk music, though different to cultivative music in many fashions, has an equivalent importance to its listeners. Primitive music, in comparison to cultivative music, uses different and few pitches, scales, and tonal patterns. Its tones are "unessential". Its melodic phrase are concise and concentrated. In essence, folk music doesn't have the "beef" to tussle with cultivative music which uses deep, broad, flowing phrases alongside with more challenging time signatures (folk music typically use the standard ones: 4/4, 3/4, 6/8). I don't see what's all the hubbub around this debate. There is no dominant music style or genre because each one pertains to its own unique audience. In my opinion, folk music is substantial. Each type of music touches someone differently, good or bad. Folk music hits home for some because it's more narrative than others. Listeners are able to connect with folk music either on a religious level, cultural level, etc. In fact, I feel as if folk music is a step above cultivative music in the sense of how open and independent it is, where cultivative music can be straight forward. Folk music's oral tradition enables it's freedom in the music community and allows it to evolve over time. Also, who cares if a song wasn't written or composed by someone famous. Personally, music is solely about the enjoyment of it, not its popularity.
Wednesday, September 17, 2014
Pianamerica: A Festival of American Piano Music (Part I)
For my first concert report, I decided to attend Pianamerica: A Festival of American Piano Music (Part I) in Hockett Family Recital Hall this past Tuesday, September 16th at 7:00 pm. Undergraduate and graduate solo pianists of Jennifer Hayghe's studio performed an array of songs pertaining to the styles of jazz, classical, and ragtime.
One thing I took note of the raw emotions that the performers put into themselves. As climatic moments reach in the songs, I saw waves of energy and intensity burst out of each one of them as they slammed the piano keys hard with enthusiasm and as their bodies swayed back and forth on the piano bench. As a member of the audience, I could feel that same wave hit myself and I was able to experience the same liveliness as the performers were expresses themselves through their performances.
My favorite performance of them all was actually the very first one performed by sophomore Alexander Simakas. Alexander played "Seven Virtuoso Etudes on Gershwin Songs" which included the likes of "Sombody Loves Me", "Embraceable You" and "I Got Rhythm". The piece in its entirety seemed ballad-like, characterized by its long, flowing chromatic phrases which led into short and slow phrases. It sounded so beautiful and silky, like a playing a harp almost. Alexander proved to be a wiz as well with his precise dynamic changes. His soft striking of the keys further exemplified the tranquil, romantic aura of the piece.
I also loved Alexander Greenberg and Chenqui Wang's ragtime charts, "Desire Rag" and "Graceful Ghost Rag". Both songs were different, however. When I think of rag music, I immediately think swing music. "Desire Rag" was not what I expected of a ragtime tune. It wasn't swung, but it was up-tempo, and it had a dancing and jiving quality to it. Actually, it made me think of the stereotypical music you would here in a saloon in an old western film. As for "Graceful Ghost Rag", this song fell along the lines of what I initially expected since it swung more than the previous song.
Comparing the music I heard to the music I have listened to in class, I can connect the music at Pianamerica to folk music on a narrative level. Though there weren't any lyrics in any of the compositions, I was able to picture a story in my head with the music being played by the solo pianists. Through Alexander Simakas' music, I imagined someone mesmerized by someone else they have a grave passion towards and is overcome with glee after discovering that that person has mutual feelings for him/her.
Overall, I thoroughly enjoyed listening to IC's brightest pianists. In fact, there were certain points within the program that I wanted to hop up on stage and play along with the musicians. On the other hand, I felt as if there wasn't much of a variation in moods through each song. The majority of the tunes conveyed more of a mellow, dramatic vibe, which I did enjoy. Throughout the show, I was yearning for some sort of shift in feeling, whether it was happy-go-lucky, or gloomy and dreary, just to mix it up a little bit. Saying that I was bored throughout the entire concert would be an utter lie. I was most certainly touched and moved by some of the music, but I wasn't shaken and rattled by the show in total. Maybe I thought this way because in my concert and jazz bands in high school, I was used to playing music with different textures and emotions.
One thing I took note of the raw emotions that the performers put into themselves. As climatic moments reach in the songs, I saw waves of energy and intensity burst out of each one of them as they slammed the piano keys hard with enthusiasm and as their bodies swayed back and forth on the piano bench. As a member of the audience, I could feel that same wave hit myself and I was able to experience the same liveliness as the performers were expresses themselves through their performances.
My favorite performance of them all was actually the very first one performed by sophomore Alexander Simakas. Alexander played "Seven Virtuoso Etudes on Gershwin Songs" which included the likes of "Sombody Loves Me", "Embraceable You" and "I Got Rhythm". The piece in its entirety seemed ballad-like, characterized by its long, flowing chromatic phrases which led into short and slow phrases. It sounded so beautiful and silky, like a playing a harp almost. Alexander proved to be a wiz as well with his precise dynamic changes. His soft striking of the keys further exemplified the tranquil, romantic aura of the piece.
I also loved Alexander Greenberg and Chenqui Wang's ragtime charts, "Desire Rag" and "Graceful Ghost Rag". Both songs were different, however. When I think of rag music, I immediately think swing music. "Desire Rag" was not what I expected of a ragtime tune. It wasn't swung, but it was up-tempo, and it had a dancing and jiving quality to it. Actually, it made me think of the stereotypical music you would here in a saloon in an old western film. As for "Graceful Ghost Rag", this song fell along the lines of what I initially expected since it swung more than the previous song.
Comparing the music I heard to the music I have listened to in class, I can connect the music at Pianamerica to folk music on a narrative level. Though there weren't any lyrics in any of the compositions, I was able to picture a story in my head with the music being played by the solo pianists. Through Alexander Simakas' music, I imagined someone mesmerized by someone else they have a grave passion towards and is overcome with glee after discovering that that person has mutual feelings for him/her.
Overall, I thoroughly enjoyed listening to IC's brightest pianists. In fact, there were certain points within the program that I wanted to hop up on stage and play along with the musicians. On the other hand, I felt as if there wasn't much of a variation in moods through each song. The majority of the tunes conveyed more of a mellow, dramatic vibe, which I did enjoy. Throughout the show, I was yearning for some sort of shift in feeling, whether it was happy-go-lucky, or gloomy and dreary, just to mix it up a little bit. Saying that I was bored throughout the entire concert would be an utter lie. I was most certainly touched and moved by some of the music, but I wasn't shaken and rattled by the show in total. Maybe I thought this way because in my concert and jazz bands in high school, I was used to playing music with different textures and emotions.
Sunday, September 14, 2014
Porchfest - ICO Brass Quintet
After attending my first Porchfest here at Ithaca, I can easily say that it was a wonderful experience. There were so many talented, unique musicians and bands out there that I had the opportunity to listen to, but the one band that I enjoyed the most had to be the Ithaca Community Orchestra (ICO) Brass Quintet. The band was comprised of two trumpets, one tuba, one trombone, and one french horn, and they all blended beautifully (http://icobrass.org). What made them so great, aside from their rich sound, was the variety of music they played. They played classical tunes from the likes of George Frederic Handel, marches, overtures, jazz, and even sprinkled in some folk music.
One classic jazz piece they performed was "Don't Get Around Much Anymore" by the iconic Duke Ellington (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyt5reZmVAI unfortunately, I didn't get a chance to ask for permission to us a recording of them that I made, so this is as closes to what it sounded like at the festival). From my perspective, the song gave off a somewhat lazy, sleepy, or lackadaisical vibe to it. The song's tempo was played around adagio (easy) and at mezzo piano (medium soft). Listening to the song makes me think of someone that literally doesn't get around much anymore; someone, possibly elderly, who lives carefree and lays in his/her bed all day. Especially during the main melody in the beginning of the tune, I picture a person putting some effort to try to get his/her up several times (the melody begins on a higher note to a lower note, and leaps back up to the same high note and back down again to the same lower note and repeats), but each time he/she finds him/herself slowly falling back into the cozy, luxurious bed that the person is so accustomed to. I also appreciated the vibrato used by some of the musicians. I thought it gave the song its authentic taste.
I felt as if the music played by the quintet was more intended for mature, older audience who grew up listening to those types of music. However, it struck a chord in me, not only because this is the genre of music I usually listen to, but that I've played most of these songs at one point before, including "Don't Get Around Much Anymore". I can remember playing that song, that melody at multiple gigs for my high school band and how much I practiced the song to make sure I had that melody embedded into my brain.
The band proceeded with the "Can-Can", which, unlike the song prior, is more lively and vigorous. From my own take, I thought by the them playing "Don't Get Around Much Anymore" established a mellow mood among the myself and the rest of the audience and then the "Can-Can" was meant to sort of "catch us all off guard" and "wake us up". Its tempo is more vivace (lively) and its dynamics were more fortissimo (very loud). It got your heart pounding again after the previous song slowed down and eased your pulse.
All in all, my first Porchfest experience was a memorable one and I hope to make it for next years festival!
One classic jazz piece they performed was "Don't Get Around Much Anymore" by the iconic Duke Ellington (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyt5reZmVAI unfortunately, I didn't get a chance to ask for permission to us a recording of them that I made, so this is as closes to what it sounded like at the festival). From my perspective, the song gave off a somewhat lazy, sleepy, or lackadaisical vibe to it. The song's tempo was played around adagio (easy) and at mezzo piano (medium soft). Listening to the song makes me think of someone that literally doesn't get around much anymore; someone, possibly elderly, who lives carefree and lays in his/her bed all day. Especially during the main melody in the beginning of the tune, I picture a person putting some effort to try to get his/her up several times (the melody begins on a higher note to a lower note, and leaps back up to the same high note and back down again to the same lower note and repeats), but each time he/she finds him/herself slowly falling back into the cozy, luxurious bed that the person is so accustomed to. I also appreciated the vibrato used by some of the musicians. I thought it gave the song its authentic taste.
I felt as if the music played by the quintet was more intended for mature, older audience who grew up listening to those types of music. However, it struck a chord in me, not only because this is the genre of music I usually listen to, but that I've played most of these songs at one point before, including "Don't Get Around Much Anymore". I can remember playing that song, that melody at multiple gigs for my high school band and how much I practiced the song to make sure I had that melody embedded into my brain.
The band proceeded with the "Can-Can", which, unlike the song prior, is more lively and vigorous. From my own take, I thought by the them playing "Don't Get Around Much Anymore" established a mellow mood among the myself and the rest of the audience and then the "Can-Can" was meant to sort of "catch us all off guard" and "wake us up". Its tempo is more vivace (lively) and its dynamics were more fortissimo (very loud). It got your heart pounding again after the previous song slowed down and eased your pulse.
All in all, my first Porchfest experience was a memorable one and I hope to make it for next years festival!
Tuesday, September 9, 2014
Louis Armstrong - When The Saints Go Marching In
I really had a hard time identifying IAC-PAC and HC-PAC cadences in the songs I usually listen to and my favorites. So I decided to chooses one of the classics: "When the Saints Go Marching In" by the great Satchimo himself, Louis Armstrong https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyLjbMBpGDA.
Originally, I set out to choose a tune from another trumpet player named Don Ellis, however, if any of you have every listened to Ellis' music, you would understand he and his band play some very unconventional and just simply wacky music with obscure time signatures. So with that, I decided to choose a song with a standard meter and with a simpler melody so I wouldn't be stressing out and pulling the hair out of my head just trying figure out phrases and cadences.
After actively listening to "When the Saints Go Marching In", I was able to conclude that the song was comprised of a HC-PAC cadence. The first eight measures of the tune (0:16-0:31) made up the half cadence. The first phrase ends on a half cadence because it ends on "re" (C). I also know this because the song is written in the key of B flat major. C is the second note of the school, meaning it is equivalent to "re" in solfege, therefore the phrase ends in a half cadence. As for the next eight bars (0:31-0:45), it was clearly a perfect authentic cadence since the final not landed on "do" (B flat). Since both melodies were basically played the same throughout, despite a couple variations in the second melody (a, a'), the two musical phrases added up to equal a parallel interrupted period.
Since I already knew the key in which the piece was written in, it wasn't too difficult to figure out the tonic and dominant chords. The tonic chord is constructed with the 1st, 3rd, and 5th notes of the scale, making this tonic chord B flat, D, and F. The dominant chord is made with the 5th, 7th, and 9th, making this dominant chord F, A, and C.
Monday, September 1, 2014
Arturo Sandoval - Marianela
As a fellow trumpeter and Jazz enthusiast myself, I take pride in listening to the greatest of the greats that were able to make that hunk of brass sing. You've got your founding fathers of jazz trumpeting (Louis Armstrong, Miles Davis, Dizzy Gillespie, etc.) who I enjoy listening too and learning from. There's the commercialists (Maynard Ferguson, Al Hirt, Doc Severinsen and such) who despite all the harsh criticism they endured throughout their careers, due to the fact that they mainly appealed to a particular audience, they were still very much influential to young, aspiring musicians like myself growing up during those time periods and even today.
But of course you have the trumpet gurus of today. Your Wynton Marsalis'. Your Jon Faddis'. The James Morrison's. All musical magicians. All of which have rang my eardrums with such eloquent musical phrases that have further intensified my love for Jazz.
The zesty Arturo Sandoval is another jazz savant of today's Mount Rushmore of trumpet players. Sandoval is known for his sizzling Latin tunes (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIWXYrK3Dis it's called "Funky Cha Cha," and it is without a doubt the definition of sexy!) and his flamboyant antics in his performances.
However, for this post I'll be discussing a somewhat more subtle piece by boisterous Sandoval called "Marianela" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDg0tnU2rlo). Unlike his more pop-oriented tunes, Sandoval's piece this time is less up-beat and jiving, but more mellow, silky, and romantic.
The song is in your standard 4/4 time signature. The tune's tempo overall is best described as largo (broad), but not a loud, belting broad... at least not up until the final solo melody. It best encompasses a ternary form (ABA'). The piece begins with some sort of electronic instrument accompanied by a piano (song texture) and ends in the same fashion with a slightly different melody at the end. Both melodies are played at mezzo piano, adding to the already smooth, gentle melody created. Each and every time I hear those to melodies, it always strikes a chord inside me because of the singing quality to it.
Listening to the song as a whole, I feel as if Sandoval is playing for someone who he is deeply affectionate towards. In addition, it seems that the structure of the song resembles the lust for this person; the passion for this certain individual is bubbling and brewing for such a long time until finally Sandoval can no longer contain his devotion as it bursts from within. The first two solos are played by what seems to be some sort of flugelhorn. The sound coming from those instruments are very mellow and tranquil and are played at mezzo piano. Unlike the first melody (0:34), which is comprised of simpler phrases, the second melody's phrases are more elongated, with an abundance of sixteenth notes (1:53). In my opinion, the second melody has a more velvety texture to it. The texture of these solos are polyphony because of the piano playing the chords, the string instruments playing their own musical lines and the light percussion in the background of the main melody.
The climatic point of the piece is the grand glissando leading into the blaring trumpet solo represents the volcanic eruption of Sandoval's undeniable adoration (3:05). The fact that he is now playing at a higher volume of fortissimo and screeching more in the upper register continues to exemplify the rays of amour and love beaming out of Sandoval's soul.
Whenever I feel down and need to find something that will pick me up, I usually turn to music. "Marianela" in particular is a heart-raising, spirit-lifting tune that helps calm my nerves and soothe my sorrows at a moment's notice. Take a listen, and enjoy the music!
But of course you have the trumpet gurus of today. Your Wynton Marsalis'. Your Jon Faddis'. The James Morrison's. All musical magicians. All of which have rang my eardrums with such eloquent musical phrases that have further intensified my love for Jazz.
The zesty Arturo Sandoval is another jazz savant of today's Mount Rushmore of trumpet players. Sandoval is known for his sizzling Latin tunes (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIWXYrK3Dis it's called "Funky Cha Cha," and it is without a doubt the definition of sexy!) and his flamboyant antics in his performances.
However, for this post I'll be discussing a somewhat more subtle piece by boisterous Sandoval called "Marianela" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDg0tnU2rlo). Unlike his more pop-oriented tunes, Sandoval's piece this time is less up-beat and jiving, but more mellow, silky, and romantic.
The song is in your standard 4/4 time signature. The tune's tempo overall is best described as largo (broad), but not a loud, belting broad... at least not up until the final solo melody. It best encompasses a ternary form (ABA'). The piece begins with some sort of electronic instrument accompanied by a piano (song texture) and ends in the same fashion with a slightly different melody at the end. Both melodies are played at mezzo piano, adding to the already smooth, gentle melody created. Each and every time I hear those to melodies, it always strikes a chord inside me because of the singing quality to it.
Listening to the song as a whole, I feel as if Sandoval is playing for someone who he is deeply affectionate towards. In addition, it seems that the structure of the song resembles the lust for this person; the passion for this certain individual is bubbling and brewing for such a long time until finally Sandoval can no longer contain his devotion as it bursts from within. The first two solos are played by what seems to be some sort of flugelhorn. The sound coming from those instruments are very mellow and tranquil and are played at mezzo piano. Unlike the first melody (0:34), which is comprised of simpler phrases, the second melody's phrases are more elongated, with an abundance of sixteenth notes (1:53). In my opinion, the second melody has a more velvety texture to it. The texture of these solos are polyphony because of the piano playing the chords, the string instruments playing their own musical lines and the light percussion in the background of the main melody.
The climatic point of the piece is the grand glissando leading into the blaring trumpet solo represents the volcanic eruption of Sandoval's undeniable adoration (3:05). The fact that he is now playing at a higher volume of fortissimo and screeching more in the upper register continues to exemplify the rays of amour and love beaming out of Sandoval's soul.
Whenever I feel down and need to find something that will pick me up, I usually turn to music. "Marianela" in particular is a heart-raising, spirit-lifting tune that helps calm my nerves and soothe my sorrows at a moment's notice. Take a listen, and enjoy the music!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





